Professional Skepticism, Time Pressure, and Auditor Independence in Fraud Detection: The Moderating Role of Professional Ethics

Authors

  • Aditya Aditya Department of Accounting, Faculty of Economics and Business, University of Muhammadiyah Malang, Indonesia
  • Dhaniel Syam Department of Accounting, Faculty of Economics and Business, University of Muhammadiyah Malang, Indonesia
  • Firda Ayu Amalia Department of Accounting, Faculty of Economics and Business, University of Muhammadiyah Malang, Indonesia

Keywords:

Professional skepticism, Time pressure, Auditor independence, Professional ethics, Fraud detection

Abstract

Study’s aims: This study examines the effects of professional skepticism,, time pressure, auditor independence, and professional ethics on fraud detection and the moderating role of professional ethics. Design/Methodology/Approach: This study employs a quantitative approach, using survey data collected via structured questionnaires from external auditors working at Public Accounting Firms (PAFs) and registered with the Indonesian Institute of Certified Public Accountants in the regions of Sulawesi, Maluku, and Papua. The data were analyzed using Partial Least Squares–Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM) to examine both direct and moderating effects. Findings: The results indicate that professional ethics has a positive and significant effect on fraud detection. Time pressure also shows a positive and significant effect, suggesting that moderate time constraints may enhance auditors' focus and efficiency. In contrast, professional skepticism, and auditor independence have positive but insignificant effects. Furthermore, professional ethics does not significantly moderate the relationships between professional skepticism,, time pressure, and auditor independence and fraud detection. Theoretical contribution/Originality: This study contributes to the Fraud Pentagon perspective by highlighting the central role of ethical values in strengthening fraud detection and providing evidence that time pressure may function as a performance driver rather than a constraint. Practitioner/Policy implication: The findings suggest that audit firms should strengthen their ethical culture and manage audit time effectively to improve the quality of fraud detection.

References

ACFE. (2025). Survei Fraud Indonesia 2025. Amerika: Association of Certified Fraud Examiners.

Agustina, F., & Rusydi, M. K. (2021). Auditors' professional skepticism and fraud detection. International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science, 10(4), 275-287. https://doi.org/10.20525/ijrbs.v10i4.1214

Al-Rawashdeh, H. A., Zureigat, B. N., Alrawashedh, N. H., Zraqat, O., Hussien, L., Zureigat, Q., & Alrashidi, M. (2024). The moderating role of professional commitment in the relationship between time budget pressure and sustainable audit quality: The mediating role of professional skepticism. Heritage and Sustainable Development, 6(1), 365-378. https://doi.org/10.37868/hsd.v6i1.475

Alawsi, S. N. A., Etemadi, H., & Rezazadeh, J. (2023). Investigating the influencing factors on trust and professional skepticism in the relationship between the auditor and the client firms’ managers. Heritage and Sustainable Development, 5(1), 135-150. https://doi.org/10.37868/hsd.v5i1.213

Almalki, A., Basodan, Y., & Boshnak, H. (2025). The mediating role of conscientiousness in the relationship between auditors’ ethical idealism and fraud detection. Journal of risk and financial management, 18(5), 244. https://doi.org/10.3390/jrfm18050244

Anggiriawan, I. P. B., & Jayawarsa, A. A. K. (2024). Auditor Independence and Experience in Fraud Detection: the Crucial Role of Professional Skepticism. International Journal of Environmental, Sustainability, and Social Science, 5(5), 1240-1248. https://doi.org/10.38142/ijesss.v5i5.1160

Castillo Gonzalez, E. (2026). Artificial Intelligence in Anti-Money Laundering: Opportunities, Threats, and the Operational Challenges Facing Financial Institutions. Dublin, National College of Ireland,

Elfia, O., & NR, E. (2022). Pengaruh pelatihan auditor, tekanan waktu, dan skeptisisme profesional terhadap kemampuan auditor dalam mendeteksi kecurangan: studi empiris pada BPK RI Perwakilan Provinsi Sumatera Barat. Jurnal Eksplorasi Akuntansi, 4(1), 178-191. https://doi.org/10.24036/jea.v4i1.476

Gärling, T., Krause, K., Gamble, A., & Hartig, T. (2014). Emotional well‐being and time pressure. PsyCh journal, 3(2), 132-143. https://doi.org/10.1002/pchj.52

Graham, K. A. (2019). Auditor personal characteristics and fraud detection skills: The mediating role of professional skepticism,. University Of Ghana,

Hair, J. F., Risher, J. J., Sarstedt, M., & Ringle, C. M. (2019). When to use and how to report the results of PLS-SEM. European business review, 31(1), 2-24. https://doi.org/10.1108/EBR-11-2018-0203

Irianto, G., & Novianti, N. (2019). Dealing with fraud: Universitas Brawijaya Press.

Khairunnisa, H., Zairin, G. M., Amirul, S. M., Prihatni, R., & Rachman, H. (2025). Unveiling the Auditor’s Lens: Impact of Workload, Time Pressure, Professional Skepticism, and Competence to Fraud Detection. Studies in Business and Economics, 20(1), 77-96. https://doi.org/10.2478/sbe-2025-0005

Kurniawan, S., & Kurniawati, K. (2024). Pengaruh Skeptisisme Profesional, Analisis Big Data, Pengalaman Auditor terhadap Pendeteksian Kecurangan. Monex: Journal of Accounting Research, 13(02), 203-224. https://doi.org/10.30591/monex.v13i02.6828

Maimunah, H., & Challen, A. E. (2025). Unveiling Fraud through the Auditor’s Lens: Professional Skepticism, Competence, Time Constraints, and Red Flags. Journal of Islamic Contemporary Accounting and Business, 3(2), 148-158. https://doi.org/10.30993/jicab.v3i2.565

McClam, J. M. (2023). Impact of Audit Time Pressure on Audit Quality.

Piserah, M., Sutjipto, V. F., Firmansyah, A., & Trisnawati, E. (2022). Perilaku Fraud Detection Pada Auditor: Professional Skepticism, Whistleblowing, Integritas, Time Pressure. Jurnal Ilmiah Akuntansi Kesatuan, 10(1), 17-28. https://doi.org/10.37641/jiakes.v10i1.1185

Ramadhany, A. A., Erlina, E., Sadalia, I., & Fachrudin, K. A. (2025). Enhancing Fraud Detection Performance: The Interplay of Red Flag Awareness, Self-Efficacy, and Professional Skepticism. Journal of risk and financial management, 18(6), 301. https://doi.org/10.3390/jrfm18060301

Rininda, B. P. (2024). Auditor’s professional skepticism and experience on fraud detection: The moderating role of professional ethical commitment. Jurnal Dinamika Akuntansi, 16(1). https://doi.org/10.15294/jda.v16i1.4037

Sakawa, H., & Watanabel, N. (2022). Accounting frauds and main-bank monitoring in Japanese corporations. Journal of Business Ethics, 180(2), 605-621. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-021-04888-z

Santoso, L. C., & Yanti, H. B. (2025). Pengaruh Kompetensi, Pengalaman, dan Skeptisisme Profesional terhadap Deteksi Kecurangan Dimoderasi Sensitivitas Etis pada Auditor Forensik. Al Qalam: Jurnal Ilmiah Keagamaan dan Kemasyarakatan, 19(1), 602-620. https://doi.org/10.35931/aq.v19i1.4368

Sinaga, I. R., Sondakh, J. J., & Warongan, J. D. (2024). The influence of independence, integrity, professionalism, and objectivity on fraud prevention in auditors with auditor ethics as a moderating variable: Empirical study at the Representative Office of the Supreme Audit Agency in North Sulawesi Province. The Contrarian: Finance, Accounting, and Business Research, 3(1), 41-52. https://doi.org/10.58784/cfabr.135

Soenjaya, H. (2024). Pengaruh Independensi, Skeptisisme, dan Kompetensi Auditor Terhadap Kualitas Audit dengan Etika Auditor sebagai Variabel Moderasi. Indonesian Journal of Auditing and Accounting, 1(2), 89-108.

Suhayati, E., & Thufailah, A. A. (2024). Fraud Detection: Professional Skepticism and Quality Control System. JURNAL ECONOMIA Учредители: Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta, 20(3), 374-387. https://doi.org/10.21831/economia.v20i3.56492

Verwey, I. G., & Asare, S. K. (2022). The joint effect of ethical idealism and trait skepticism on auditors’ fraud detection. Journal of Business Ethics, 176(2), 381-395. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-020-04718-8

Wahyuni, N., & Isniawati, A. (2021). Analisis faktor-faktor kemampuan auditor mendeteksi kecurangan dengan memoderasi etika profesi. Journal of Business and Information Systems (e-ISSN: 2685-2543), 3(2), 75-86. https://doi.org/10.36067/jbis.v3i2.102

Downloads

Published

2026-02-07

How to Cite

Aditya, A., Syam, D., & Amalia, F. A. (2026). Professional Skepticism, Time Pressure, and Auditor Independence in Fraud Detection: The Moderating Role of Professional Ethics. Journal of Ethics and ESG, 1(1), 23–33. Retrieved from https://journal.ets-institute.com/index.php/JEE/article/view/5